Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Scott Richardson (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. This close is without prejudice against the article's content being merged if found necessary at a later point in time. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 14:43, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

James Scott Richardson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All refs are dead. Can't find any live ones and in any event he doesn't seem to have done anything notable beyond operating a website that was fined, which comes under WP:1E. We either need to find sources that demonstrate notability or delete this unsourced article per WP:BLP   Harry    Let us have speaksundefined 15:53, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge salvageable content to Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team (or perhaps Tri-City Skins). Mind  matrix  16:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I updated the CBC ref with a working archive link. Mind  matrix  16:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge (or possibly delete) - no evidence of sustained notability for political activities. Blythwood (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:47, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. No coverage except for one incident where he and another person were fined by a court for "spreading hate". Google search finds only social media; Google News finds only other people with the same name. --MelanieN (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Searches didn't turn up enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources to show he passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:42, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to either Canadian Ethnic Cleansing Team or Tri-City Skins. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
 * delete per MelanieN, whose search results I duplicated. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.