Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Simpson (footballer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete all 7. Fram (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

James Simpson (footballer)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Player(s) do(does) not meet WP:FOOTY/Notability GauchoDude (talk) 22:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because players do not meet WP:FOOTY/Notability:


 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all plus recommend fellow Newport players Jacob Giles, Craig Hughes, Lee John and Paul Cochlin for the same reason. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  09:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * CommentIf it can be shown that Barry Town were fully professional in the 1990s there could be grounds for keeping Craig Hughes. None of the others seem to meet WP:FOOTY/Notability and should be deleted. King of the  North  East  10:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Good point. This BBC article suggests that they turned professional in 1995, and this one shows that they still were in 2003. I have denominated Hughes as a result. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  12:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Paul Cochlin's article says he played for Carmarthen Town in the UEFA Cup. That would imply a first team appearance as well as Carmarthen Town being the top of the Welch Premier League.  I will nominate the remaining two players. GauchoDude (talk) 23:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Carmarthen have never finished higher that 4th, and aren't fully pro (they only qualified for UEFA as runners-up in the Welsh Cup. Cochlin's article should be deleted. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  08:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have now added him. GauchoDude (talk) 09:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and number 57. John Hayestalk 19:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all per above. Punkmorten (talk) 12:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:03, 18 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Not to be confused with Orenthal James Simpson. Mandsford (talk) 16:16, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I am pretty sure no one is making that mistake. However, yes, this is not O.J. Simpson, lol.  I'm pretty sure the decision was a resounding delete, not sure why this is up here again, but it's still a delete in my book since I proposed it in the first place. GauchoDude (talk) 10:14, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom Ban  Ray  20:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.