Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Spaulding (Guiding Light)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 01:24, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

James Spaulding (Guiding Light)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-appearing fictional character. Originally this material appeared when an anon IP simply replaced the material at James Spaulding with this. When I discovered it I separated out the histories, as you can see here. But I think this one should be considered for deletion anyway. Chick Bowen 01:32, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete IMDb suggests this character appeared once on the show, played by twins, which suggest a minor child/infant character.--Sethacus 03:33, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of sources attesting to the notability of this character Corpx 06:16, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The character is already mentioned in the Guiding Light (1990-1999) article. Last sentence: Their dalliance produced a son they named James. In the last few years, James has hardly been seen.. Out of simple curiosity (my mother used to religiously watch this show) I did some digging, and it seems that two main characters, while married to others, were in a plane crash, thought they were going to die, and, well, this child was conceived. It should be noted, that most of the "soap fan" sites have separate pages for each character, and none of them did for this child. I'd say mention him when/if they decide to age him by 15 years overnight, and he becomes an actual part of the show. Until then, I don't see a reason for an entire article about him. Ariel ♥ Gold 06:17, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A not-notable fictional character with nothing of substance to write about. --Malcolmxl5 11:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable secondary sources. Jay32183 01:40, 12 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.