Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James T Harris III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

James T Harris III

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete nn president of nn institution Mayalld 16:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, reads like a news release. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 16:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Nothing else to say. 1ForTheMoney 17:05, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hammer1980 ·talk 17:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep -- university presidents are inherently notable and this one does not lack for press coverage (>1000 Google News archive hits)-- A. B. (talk) 17:40, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: most of those Ghits are not pertinent, though. If you search for "James Harris" and "Widener" or for "James T. Harris" and "Widener", you get many fewer hits and even those are not all pertinent. Harris and James are rather common names.... --Crusio 19:07, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 17:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletions.  -- A. B. (talk) 17:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. Has been (vice-)president of several smaller universities/colleges. I have cleaned-up the article and tagged it for better sourcing and verification. --Crusio 18:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. President of a university is notable, he's won several awards, and his name appears in the press.  For example, he was just listed in the Philadelphia Inquirer as one of the higher paid university presidents:  --Elonka 03:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Elonka. that the institution is relatively unimportant would seem to make this all the more notable. But the awards must be referenced DGG (talk) 05:17, 5 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.