Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Taylor: Pull Over Tour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:48, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

James Taylor: Pull Over Tour

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Standard musical artist tour with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NCONCERT. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per IAR. James Taylor is so high-profile that as far as I'm concerned all of his tours are notable by extension. CJK09 (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:NOTINHERITED. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 20:11, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Which is why I specified IAR. James Taylor is so prominent, he isn't just "meets notability criteria", he is far and beyond that, so I am proposing NOTINHERITED be ignored in this case for the sake of improving the encyclopedia. CJK09 (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * This could very well be merged with a simplestatement in the James Taylor article that reads, "From June 1 to October 27, 2001, Taylor embarked on his Pull Over Tour in support of the compilation album Greatest Hits Volume 2". And even that would have to be sourced for inclusion. The content here certainly doesn't warrant a stand-alone article. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 20:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:43, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * What about DVD Talk, Billboard, Amazon.com editorial review, and Digitally Obsessed? Do they help? --George Ho (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 20:45, 17 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:09, 24 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 12:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:59, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:00, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. No suggestion that the tour is in itself notable, no matter how famous he is. Rathfelder (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable concert tour fails both WP:GNG and WP:CONCERT TOUR, with only one reference that is invoked in the article, but it is not defined, so really there are no references. Aspects (talk) 04:12, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Digitally Obsessed (mentioned above by George Ho) is a RS because while anyone can apply to become a reviewer, they have strict standards and editorial control and it covers the subject at length. Additionally, there is some coverage at newspapers.com . Imho, it's sufficient to establish stand-alone notability but even if not, it can easily be merged into the main article, so I see no reason to delete. Regards  So  Why  09:41, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.