Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Thorp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Deleted  Wikipedia is not for promotional use, Youtube, while a notable website, does not imply merit in the assertation of notability because the user is award winning within the site itself. No external reliable sources of notability to be had. Keegan talk 05:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

James Thorp

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of Notability Wisdom89 04:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:N and WP:V, no sources are cited at all. Also you tube is not a reliable source. meshach 05:00, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:N. Stats for a YouTube channel mean nothing here until they are comparable to those of corporate partners like Universal Music Group, CBS, NHL, etc.  Even then, the article would still need reliable sources.  Ichormosquito 05:45, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.