Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Wardell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 18:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

James Wardell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no credible sources to show notability. PROD previously declined - moving to AFD  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 20:00, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Speedy Delete I consider this highly promotional bio for a non-notable individual in search of a wider audience. Eminently speediable per WP:CSD. --  Ohc  ¡digame! 04:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:26, 8 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I did the initial prod. At the time there were only two valid links among the refs and only one of the two was about the subject. Most of the refs still appear self-published or just a photo credit. Fails WP:CREATIVE. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  05:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.