Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James X. Zhang


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

James X. Zhang

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Individual's notability is not established. Single source appears to be write-up from the individual's employer, not a third-party, independent source.  McDoob AU93  18:08, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Only content on article was copied from source with unknown copyright status. CombatWombat42 (talk) 18:20, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Another editor has found more sources. None of them provide notability. CombatWombat42 (talk) 18:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. The copyvio seems to have been removed already, so we can concentrate instead on notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:53, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete seems somewhat promotional and like a violation of WP:GNG — Preceding unsigned comment added by CogitoErgoSum14 (talk • contribs)
 * DeleteI was asked for an opinion. I don't think there is sufficient notability at this point to meet WP:PROF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per DGG - whom I trust on issues involving WP:PROF. I can't see how he passes, but if he gets a higher appointment, I'd change my mind. Bearian (talk) 17:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.