Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James arvanitakis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

James arvanitakis

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Autobiographical article with notability concerns and lack of adequate verifiable third-party sources. Enough importance is claimed to pass A7, but Ghits is primarily personal blog and social media sites. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 02:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. The article needs a lot of work doing to it and it needs to be referenced properly and/or pruned accordingly. He is a sociologist and has a large presence on social media sites. There is enough coverage to meet WP:GNG. He is also an author of more than one book and they too have coverage.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 08:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 09:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Jenks24 (talk) 05:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom - no real indications of notability or references to establish this. Nick-D (talk) 07:53, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete fails to meet notability threshold for academics -- Samir 07:56, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - autobiography according to this. It would immediately fuel the deletion up, as well as the fact that he's simply a senior lecturer. SwisterTwister (talk) 06:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.