Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James robert nolan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 17:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

James robert nolan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Author contested WP:PROD. No substantiate claims of notability. Article reads like a CV, and so goes against WP:NOTCV. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  19:42, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as unreferenced BLP of an individual without proven notability per WP:BLP. Yet another reason why that policy is so important: without references to reliable third parties, there's no way to prove that the James Robert Nolan who is the subject of this article is the same James Robert Nolan who filed those patents. --NellieBly (talk) 20:02, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - inventors must be notable generally, or meet the "prof test". Bearian (talk) 18:56, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note – The author seems to have consented to the deletion. Does that qualify for WP:CSD? — Fly by Night  ( talk )  19:39, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Article reads sort of like a resume, and I can't really see how the person is notable. Steven Walling  04:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per Wikipedia guidelines. I didn't any hits on the "James Robert Nolan" on both Yahoo and Google. SwisterTwister (talk) 05:57, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.