Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamesoniella


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Seraphim&hearts; Whipp  17:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Jamesoniella

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A genus that only has one species doesn't seem to need an article. Unless there are more species, it should either redirect to Jamesoniella undulifolia or be deleted. SeizureDog (talk) 20:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * redirect seems far more constructive than deletion. Pete.Hurd (talk) 20:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * keep per Mangostar. Pete.Hurd (talk) 22:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article itself indicates there could be more species, which is confirmed by a google search. Mangostar (talk) 22:18, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. There seems to be a number of species in this genus, even though the current article mentions only one. Deor (talk) 23:03, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, genera are notable enough.  Corvus cornix  talk  23:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.