Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jameth

Article created again. Delete --DuKot 03:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 12:02, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jameth
Anti-vanity. A lot of these seem to crop up amongst deadenders.--ZayZayEM 03:55, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * delete anti-vanity. RJFJR 04:38, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Are there grounds for speedy on something like this?


 * Delete, not notable, personal attack, article as it stands is un-encyclopaedic. Megan1967 05:32, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as attack page, probable libel. Shimeru 05:33, Feb 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I almost speedied this as a candidate for speedy deletion case #3: Pure vandalism, but on looking at the talk page history there's more to this. It seems a website advertisement, and that's not a speedy. Andrewa 12:37, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * These idiots have popped up before, with the resulting creation of encyclopedia dramatica after we deleted an article on this moronic subject. Delete garbage, possibly as recreation of speedily deleted content which I can't find at the moment. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 21:19, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as vandalism or libel, pick one. Wyss 22:08, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Originally a vanity page, then vandalized into a personal attack. Either way it goes in the circular file.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 02:05, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think Cyrius' recollection is correct.  I seem to recall this as well.  Edeans 05:22, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete This seems to be a vandalism victim...--Urbanguy1 00:49, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:27, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Very not-notable -- I third Cyrius, I don't remember the original article title, but it claimed that the minor spat in question had "consumed LiveJournal" for the entire summer in which it occurred, and the VfD drew in a sizable number of "run-in" voters. -- Antaeus Feldspar 08:42, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, victim of personal attack by vandalism. Mgm|(talk) 13:14, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.