Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Baratta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Jamie Baratta

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable individual lacking GHIts and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 03:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: No major sources provided. NN, definitely fails WP:BIO.-- Lester  05:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: as per nom. NZ forever (talk) 05:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:38, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Major Sources provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sourcea (talk • contribs) 05:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)  — Sourcea (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment – Unfortunately the resources provided are not "non-trivial".  ttonyb (talk) 05:41, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * ""Keep"" "non-trivial" sources provided including major publication Latina Magazine. Major Corporations cited included Island Def Jam Records and Ralph Lauren. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.26.150.206 (talk) 08:09, 9 September 2010 (UTC) — 69.26.150.206 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment – As stated above, the resources provided are not "non-trivial" and do not meet the criteria in reliable sources This is just a question and not an acquisition-are you by any chance the same person as Sourcea who also !voted above?  ttonyb  (talk) 13:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete unless better sources can be found VASterling (talk) 19:42, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.