Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Brooks (pornographic actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 12:56, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Jamie Brooks (pornographic actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fails WP:PORNBIO and GNG. She only appears to have won one non-notable award, which seems only to have existed from 2006-08. Also she only has one AVN nomination, not nominations across multiple years. EuroPride (talk) 19:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There's evidence that the UK Adult Film and Television Awards are ongoing and that there have been awards since 2008. I found an article on the Telegraph which states: "Named best director in the 2008 and 2009 UK Adult Film and Television Awards". Additionally, there have been mentions in the mainstream media about the awards: BBC and Channel 4 news for one. Tabercil (talk) 22:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. EuroPride (talk) 12:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep She won the UK award, which is still a notable awards show. And having two nominations (one win) means multiple years. Silver  seren C 19:31, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Tabercil. If nominator wishes to afd an award winner based on the argument that the award is not notable, perhaps he should try afd-ing the article for the awards first due to its notability issues. Morbidthoughts (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. UK award itself isn't really notable, but the awards ceremony gets press coverage because of the publicity stunts used to market tickets to it. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:57, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Is there a consensus somewhere that states that it isn't notable? And is there a list somewhere of notable porn awards? I know there is somewhere, can you link me to it? Silver  seren C 01:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Well originally PORNBIO stated that it was anything listed in Category:Pornographic film awards, but that's been pulled out and replaced with "Has won a well-known award such as one of the AVN Awards." Problem with that statement is that it leaves things kinda at loose ends as it's now a North American-centric definition... Tabercil (talk) 01:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Especially considering the UK awards are on that list. I have no idea why they would choose to make the requirements even more vague. Silver  seren C 01:20, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - "Notable awards shows" don't have a Coming soon banner and nothing else as their official website. Tarc (talk) 02:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Tabercil and Morbid. --93.158.79.103 (talk) 11:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO per notable award. Epbr123 (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tarc. Where are the examples of non-trivial coverage from multiple, reliable third party publications?  Oh, there are none?  The award doesn't give me the warm fuzzies, especially given that the official website for the awarding agency is "coming soon".   I bet.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) ✄ ✄ ✄	 13:47, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Curiously, the release for which she supposedly won an "award" appears not to exist, outside of the "award" announcement.Google search results This reflects both on the notability of the "award" and the reliability of the sources cited. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.