Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Campbell (author)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Jamie Campbell (author)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Nor any book reviews. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Edwardx (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KSAWikipedian (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and England. Shellwood (talk) 15:36, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete albeit reluctantly. He seems to be active mainly with works of local interest, in particular tide tables for East Anglia/Norfolk. But I do not find any sources about him. Lamona (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Neutral: For the author's local focus in East Anglia/Norfolk he seems notable, but I concede that there are few secondary sources. I might recommend improving the article instead of deleting.--IndyNotes (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * How would you suggest improving it? This discussion is more about what sources exist, not the current state of the article though, as per WP:NEXIST. I think finding some significant reviews of his publications is one route to improving the article, but if they don't exist, not a lot more can be done. -Kj cheetham (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete lack of independant significant coverage to warrant a pass of WP:GNG/WP:NAUTHOR. I couldn't find any significant reviews of any of his published works. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.