Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Hanley (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirected to Pudsey (UK Parliament constituency). No prejudice to anybody undoing the close if it's deemed inappropriate. (non-admin closure) Ansh666 17:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Jamie Hanley
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deleted in a previous AfD and re-created with no discussion. Nothing has changed since the previous AfD: Hanley does not meet WP:POLITICIAN Bondegezou (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Article was (re)created by User:Rathfelder, who has created similar articles for several other Labour Party candidates. I have PROD'd several and Articles for deletion/Adrian Heald is also ongoing. I've put a note on his/her Talk page, but would welcome further review from other editors. Bondegezou (talk) 14:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable candidate. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Is not a notable candidate for office. Tiller54 (talk) 17:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: The subject fails WP:POLITICIAN and has no other visible claim to notability; no reason to overturn previous AfD consensus. AllyD (talk) 18:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Simply being an as-yet-unelected candidate in an ongoing or future election is not, in and of itself adequate notability to justify a Wikipedia article under WP:NPOL — either you demonstrate that the candidate was already notable enough to qualify for an article under a different inclusion criterion before they were named a candidate, or they do not become notable enough for a Wikipedia article until they win the election. Bearcat (talk) 21:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: the creator of this article has changed it to a re-direct to the constituency (at my suggestion, as a way to preserve work done should the individual become notable at a later date). Should we wind up the AfD? Bondegezou (talk) 22:27, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.