Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Manderson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   deleted. I realize this was recreated after a prod deletion, and this is the appropriate venue. The article does not belong on Wikipedia, and we don't need five days to figure that out. Creator sufficiently warned. Keeper   76  18:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Jamie Manderson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article about a common (albeit prolific) traffic criminal. No information is provided other than extremely negative information (even though it is cited). This opens the doors for articles on all criminals who get spot coverage in a news article somewhere but have no actual notability. Chris lk02  Chris Kreider 16:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - As nominator. Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 17:03, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Er, but you are the nominator?!? Man with a tan (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hency why I say, As Nominator (as opposed to per nominator). Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 17:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Information provided, whilst not exactly flattering, is neutral and factual. Article is certainly notable, given the frequency at which convictions occur. Man with a tan (talk) 17:10, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Above editor re-created the article. Please disclose this next time. Jclemens (talk) 17:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I actually speedy deleted it the first time. Probably should have taken it to AFD (hench why I have done so once it was re-created).  Chris  lk02  Chris Kreider 17:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Nowhere near enough information for him to have his own WP:BIO article. Perhaps the content could be merged to Traffic ticket or somewhere similarly appropriate, but I'm not convinced he's notable enough for that to be worth doing. EyeSerene talk 17:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy as an attack page on a non public figure. Protonk (talk) 18:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.