Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Shannon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep. Jayjg (talk) 04:00, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Jamie Shannon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable. Minor roles, no independent coverage. SummerPhD (talk) 00:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 *  Keep Strong keep per meeting WP:ANYBIO's "has received a notable award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times", and pushing nicely at WP:ENT. Article simply needs expansion and proper sourcing. Will be on it myself later this evening.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Upped to "strong" above. Article has been expanded and sourced. Individual passes WP:ENT, WP:BIO and WP:GNG... and there's lots more available.  With respects to him, the nom and I must simply use different google-foo.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:46, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Google news search at the top shows plenty of results. Add in the name of what heis most notable for, and it thins it out, but still produces results that prove he is notable.   D r e a m Focus  07:30, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - at least one major role, and winner of a Gemini. Bearian (talk) 17:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schmidt.   talk 16:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.