Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Summers (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Jamie Summers
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Failes both PORNBIO & GNG. As a blp this should therefore be deleted. Spartaz Humbug! 00:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as can't find any evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO + GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:53, 24 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails GNG without non-trivial coverage by reliable sources. Even if you count Adult Video News as reliable, coverage is limited to passing mentions. Only plausible claim for PORNBIO would be starring in The Brat film series (criterion #2). That would need acknowledgement by reliable sources. All I could find is a mention in XBIZ. • Gene93k (talk) 10:45, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails to meet notability guidelines for ponographic actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Same rationale as in last discussion. "She was one of the main subjects in a book about 80-90s porn.[1][2]. I remember Jamie Loves Jeff was considered a groundbreaking movie/blockbuster (criteria 2 of WP:PORNBIO) at the time since that was Jeff Stryker's crossover movie.[3][4][5]" There were reliable sources supporting this but not added to the article, some of them have been linkrotted. Morbidthoughts (talk) 04:27, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability and "groundbreaking" have to be proven, not cited to one's memory of flipping through a review in a porn magazine 20 years ago. So we're left with the usual non-notable porn industry links, non-notable films, and so on.  WP:GNG failure. Tarc (talk) 03:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.