Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Thompson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:34, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Jamie Thompson

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Biographical article on a Canadian--well, I'm not sure what, and the article doesn't really help. Packed with pointless detail, but rather short on actual claims of notability or public notice thereof. Prod tag removed by article creator, for which this article and one on his 'organisation' are his only contributions. CalendarWatcher (talk) 23:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Well, I was trying to be cautious, thinking perhaps I had missed something under all the words. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 05:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete No claims of notability, no independant sources. Could have been Speedied.  Edward321 (talk) 23:53, 6 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete This appears to be a biography/resume' disguised as an article.  The subject lacks notability, it is completely unreferenced, and speedy delete (together with his company Rowdys Inc.) is justified in this case.Yachtsman1 (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * A7 this. I agree with Yachtsman1. Lacks any notability and references per WP:N.  ~Beano~  (talk) (contribs)  01:20, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as A7. Notability not even asserted. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per above. Non-notable. ~ Pip 2  andahalf  04:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.