Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Wingo

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was '''5 Keep / 5 Delete. Kept.''' -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:40, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Jamie Wingo
A brief filmography list of an 80s gay porn actor. No content whatsoever, marginal notability, and has strange category links up top. I can't see this developing into an encyclopedic article. - Mark 11:38, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) (Strikethrough added by Mark at 13:56, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC) since anon user improved article a bit after listing) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep, Google yields 3190 hits for that name and it appears quite a few of them are about this person. I'd say enough notability. Inter 13:10, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: 3,000 hits is miniscule for a porno actor. Porn actors are never-ending, and going into every single porn actor is absolutely not encyclopedic.  Geogre 13:48, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - no reason to delete - David Gerard 23:16, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Verifiable, real actor.  RickK 00:11, Jan 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, not notable enough. Megan1967 01:39, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. humblefool&reg; 05:27, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a database of everyone who's ever fucked on film. -R. fiend 23:04, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems more than notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia.  GRider\talk 19:16, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Geogre said it. Edeans 05:33, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Why delete it? I mean, he's not so well-known, but what's the harm in being comprehensive?Zantastik 07:43, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)