Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamila Coleman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Jamila Coleman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Marginally asserts importance but lacks reliable sources to substantiate the claim. Subject simply does not meet the threshold for Wikipedia. JodyBtalk 12:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. Jeremiah (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 05:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  treelo  radda  00:24, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. There isn't even an assertion of notability outside of the book she wrote, and the book would most likely fail WP:BOOK at any rate... I would tag for WP:A7, but there isn't any rush. D ARTH P ANDA duel 01:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * delete per above. Worldcat comes up with nothing to show notability of book or author. References listed in article do not show non trivial coverage. No significant, third party coverage.  Dloh  cierekim  07:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. The Real Libs-speak politely 18:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find some sources to prove she was a victim (never a reason to keep a BLP) but I don't see any real claim of notability here. She wrote one book, which isn't enough to pass the threshold.  She is doing some fine work, maybe someone will notice and write an article on her in a newspaper sometime in the future.  D ENNIS B ROWN  (T) (C) 14:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.