Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamilah B. Creekmur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Jamilah B. Creekmur

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable individual lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO.  ttonyb (talk) 00:21, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, thx for the info expressing why Jamilah B. Creekmur may be deleted. Im VERY new at wiki, and would like to keep everything as simple and basic as possible. I've edited the bio, and compiled all information from notable sources. I do know that she's an author, and business woman, very known in the entertainment and music world. How can I include the only the necessary info so that as an author and COO she stays up? thank you Suganique (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC) — Suganique (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

This person is without a doubt, a 'person of note' I respectfully ask why this article is pending deletion Geekmaster1 (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC) — Geekmaster1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Subject is not notable enough. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 20:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, the two dissenters above are sockpuppets or at least meatpuppets. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - no actual evidence of notability; strong suspicions of conflict of interest. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:14, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.