Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamillette Gaxiola


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Jamillette Gaxiola

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 21:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I could find no significant coverage in reliable sources. She does have some coverage in Spanish and Portuguese but it tends to be voyeuristic press release-type stuff and crappy interviews, AFAICT. BethNaught (talk) 08:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Sigh. Withdrawing my !vote per . Many of their links aren't to the most reliable sources but I now think it is reasonable to conclude that she passes GNG. BethNaught (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep as subject crosses the verifiability threshold and notability thresholds with a spread of independent coverage from around the globe, including from Mexico, Costa Rica, Mexico, South Africa, Mexico, the United States, Australia, the United States, and so on. - Dravecky (talk) 13:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
 * In general, your sources are not very convincing. But this one offers a tiny opportunity. Unfortunately, her IMDb does not say anything useful. And the article about the series she was in, does not come much further than "unknown episodes". And conform Biographies of living persons, sources just must be given when challenged. And that is just what I did with this nomination: challenge the whole article. The Banner talk 16:51, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 20:34, 5 March 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Redirect to Miss_Earth_2009. Wikipedia is drowning in a sea of these beauty contest participants who go on to a sprinkling of WP:Routine interviews and kayfabe, and minor appearances on allegedly "hit reality show"s...then disappear. Pax 00:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple sources listed above by Dravecky. Subject crosses the verifiability threshold and establishes notability.    WordSeventeen (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.