Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamison Ernest


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:28, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Jamison Ernest

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very few substantive WP:RS that don't establish WP:GNG or WP:ARTIST for this vanispam Autobiography. All the references are either press release promo junk, or very passing mentions in society columns. The best I could find was this from the NYPost. Many of the claims are misleading at best, if not downright untruths: e.g the paragraph full of claims of equal collaboration with Vito Schnabel but the best I could verify here was that they are friends, and Schnabel has been photographed at Ernest's events twice. None of the reviews mention Ernest at all. A ton of bad faith name-dropping here and a lot of mentions of working with (e.g for) other famous people, but not in ways that would rise to the kind of collaboration to satisfy WP:ARTIST(3). Theredproject (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  samee  converse  20:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  samee  converse  20:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  samee  converse  20:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  samee  converse  20:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, there are so many refs I don't have time to go through them, I opened a few at random and they concur with the nom. Needs some TNT and it could come back sensibly at a later time if anyone is interested enough. I'm not immune from changing my vote if someone wants to highlight good refs. Szzuk (talk) 18:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Something like "deletion is justified in cases of extreme vanity-directed editing that cannot be repaired by TNT" would be very useful to add to the deletion criteria. Might be notable but vanity effort obscures facts.104.163.140.141 (talk) 02:48, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.