Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamiyyath-ul-Salaf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

Jamiyyath-ul-Salaf

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod contested by suspicious SPAs; the deprodding was reverted multiple times by trustworthy people but it won't kill us to have a debate just on the off chance one of these users was merely a sockpuppet and not actually banned. Deletion concern is lack of available sourcing - no news, scholarly, or books hits from Google. I say weak delete, weak because as a foreign-language topic I can believe sourcing might exist in another language. Mango juice talk 04:15, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Possible sources:, . I don't see anything for notability. Abductive (talk) 04:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, promotional, polemical... several reasons to delete, and I can't see a single good one to keep, unless someone finds some RS'ing. Jclemens (talk) 06:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for the prod reasons... fails GNG standards. DreamGuy (talk) 16:23, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.