Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jammu and Kashmir People's Movement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:46, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Jammu and Kashmir People's Movement

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable minor political party. G11 and G12'd in the past. No significant coverage other than its founding. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 20:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:40, 30 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - what do you expect a two month old crowdfunded political party to do? they already explained in why they wont run for elections
 * I do not know why you have nominated the page for deletion, Talk:Jammu and Kashmir People's Movement concurs. Mhveinvp (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep - A couple more recent sources. Clearly meets WP:GNG. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:40, 4 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment:  The issue is that in the provided sources, which are all routine coverage, the party is only subject to passing mentions in the articles listed, and not even mentioned directly in a few of the sources. If it's a recently started party, as you claim, then perhaps it is WP:TOOSOON for an article. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)
 * The two sources I have provided above do represent significant coverage as needed for WP:GNG. It is clear that this party represents a significant development in Jammu and Kashmir as practically every national newspaper has covered them. Some of the press has also carried out detailed analyses of their agenda. The party is set to contest the next Assembly elections and frankly it is silly to quibble over whether its page should exist or not. WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:17, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete (WP:INDIA contributor here). Non notable political party that has not won any elections and no indication why it is notable. Notablity is WP:NOTINHERITED. Whatever coverage this party is getting is dependent coverage based on its founder. This includes all the links above and those on the article. This dependent coverage cannot be used to claim notability. Also fails Notability (organizations and companies) due to this basic criteria. I would like to thank User:Sandstein for relisting this discussion. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  17:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Just Chilling (talk) 00:07, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete It's not notable political party and just two month old party which didn't won any election yet. Not given enough coverage by reliable and major sources to meet WP:Notability criteria. If this political party will play significant role in politics of India and in upcoming elections then it should be added. There is no deadline. --Harshil169 (talk) 08:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep - Lots of coverage and I entirely disagree with DBX on his assessment of INHERITED. &#x222F; WBG converse 12:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I clicked on your link above and randomly chose this 4th link and this is how the article starts " this is a text book example of INHERITED coverage. And lots of inherited coverage does NOT indicate notability.-- D Big X ray ᗙ  05:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Everyone says SRK’s Red chillies. But Red chillies is notable. 106.66.180.36 (talk) 09:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:OSE-- D Big X ray ᗙ  07:00, 18 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Too soon for a political party to be notable enough to pass GNG. Delete without any apprehension for recreation in next few years if it becomes worthwhile by then. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment, is a redirect to the founder out of the question as a wikireader search term? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete is not a notable political party to pass GNG. --SalmanZ (talk) 21:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.