Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamo's law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy deleted by User:Shell Kinney under CSD G7. BryanG(talk) 06:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Jamo's law
Violates WP:NOR (to which page author agrees) as well as WP:HOAX (the math is simply not right). Irongargoyle 02:15, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete 16x18=288. Fan-1967 02:42, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Now, call me a math major, but this is the stupidest damn thing I've ever seen. First of all, even if it wasn't made up, one should surely realize that this "law" being only for two-digit numbers makes no sense, as multiplying xxx3 by xxx4 will always result in xxxx2, no matter how many other digits are involved. In addition, this nonexistent law doesn't work for 6, as the terrible article states- 2x6=12, 4x6=24, 6x6=36, 8x6=48. I'm getting really worked up over this, but only because it's so idiotic. -- Kicking222 03:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

yes, ok, i made a mistake, please delete it!
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.