Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan-erik lane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep.-- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 19:48, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Jan-erik lane
Vanity article in that it was created by the person in question - but maybe it should stay because of notability in that it asserts a certain amount in the volume of work published. Benjaminstewart05 17:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Plainly notable; numerous Google hits. Article needs a lot of work tho', sourcing etc. BlueValour 17:16, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * keep and cleanup if you yourslef admit it is worth having, why did you nominate it? Joeyramoney 19:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I did not say that it was worth having, I said that although it was a vanity article (delete?) it did contain some material which could be considered notable (keep?) - so I put it here to see what other users thought, delete or keep - simple. Benjaminstewart05 19:42, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lane appears to have published a whole bunch of books. The Swedish national library catalogue LIBRIS gives 145 hits for his name (both books and articles). And you can withdraw the nomination if you wish. WP:AUTO is not in itself a deletion reason, just a reason to be wary. up+land 20:38, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename to Jan-erik Lane. It needs a cleanup but he seems notable enough for mine. Perhaps we should also advise the author of the relevant guidelines. Capitalistroadster 03:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.