Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Hilary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Jan Hilary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NMODEL and WP:GNG. As per WP:BEFORE a search on the web threw up nothing of interest. One of the sources is very vague, "my models" is it a book, a song, a magazine ? And one photo-shoot over 30 years ago does not make him notable. Domdeparis (talk) 12:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment No objection. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:45, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * keep - jan hilary is a well known male model. The srticle is bad. But that can all be fixed. A simple Google search gives good sources. Per WP:GNG. BabbaQ (talk) 17:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Please can you add the sources here that you have found. Domdeparis (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I have so far added sources to prove his work in Paris as a model.BabbaQ (talk) 21:10, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Those are not in depth secondary sources as per WP:GNG just proof that he has done some modeling. Did you find anything else? Domdeparis (talk) 21:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Delete I haven't found any sources that establish notability (but i concede that it can be hard to find relevant sources considering when he started his career). The sources in the article aren't really independent of the subject, and they are not secondary sources. Icepic appears to be a personal website, not a WP:RS. Sjö (talk) 09:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete no show of notable coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.