Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Maria Plojhar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

Jan Maria Plojhar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  18:36, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 18:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. Can be expanded from cs:Jan Maria Plojhar Also, discussed at https://books.google.com/books?id=KxaTLaIG9WcC&pg=PA105&dq=%22Jan+Maria+Plojhar%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj0saSMirHcAhXM5IMKHbWxAdEQ6AEIRjAF Quote: "A classic example of the Adulterous Muse in Czech literature occurs in Julius Zeyer's novel Jan Maria Plojhar (written between November 1887 and February or March 1888).20 In a number of respects, the hero, ..." Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep - Bad faith nomination, one of two made in a single minute. WP:BEFORE is being flouted and (semi-)automation abused. Carrite (talk) 14:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies criteria 5 of WP:NBOOK because the author, Julius Zeyer, is of exceptional historical importance, such that you would expect his works to be studied. His importance is explained by his biography in The Penguin Companion to Literature (Penguin Books, 1969, ed. Anthony Thorlby, volume 2 (European Literature), page 838). The "Penguin Companion" is a book that includes only the most important authors and is exceptionally highly selective. Further, the "Penguin Companion" says this book is one of the "best novels" he wrote. James500 (talk) 18:21, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added more sources in English that prove notability, and I've added some basic plot and thematic notes. The Czech article gives a longer plot summary that could be adapted to this article, which would make it longer than could reasonably be merged into Julius Zeyer. Mortee (talk) 09:07, 27 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.