Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Paul Huissoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Jan Paul Huissoon

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NACADEMIC. Possible vanity. Jdcooper (talk) 18:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Citations on Scholar are pretty weak for what I assume is a high-citation field, and no other WP:NPROF criterion besides C1 seems relevant. Certainly does not pass WP:BASIC. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 22:15, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROF. This person is a "professor of knowledge". Very funny indeed. 122.60.173.107 (talk) 07:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet our notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:22, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - perhaps WP:TOOSOON. -Kj cheetham (talk) 10:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. He publishes as "Jan P. Huissoon" so the search above that spells out his middle name is not accurate. But even correcting for that, I didn't find enough citations to make a convincing case for WP:PROF, and there doesn't seem to be any other claim of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.