Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Scholten


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  03:58, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Jan Scholten

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

"Dutch practitioner of homeopathy and author of several books." Lack of coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Fails Notability (academics) and WP:AUTHOR. The article has been trimmed quite a bit since its largest version in May 2008. -Location (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. A pseudophysician practising pseudomedicine and producing pseudoscholarship. Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:23, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. This subject does not appear to pass any of the standards for a WP:BLP article. None of this subject's publications seem to have had that much impact even within the fringe field in which he publishes. --Salimfadhley (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources hugely fail RS and a Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. The article also has more than a whiff of WP:PROFRINGE about it. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. and above comments. --Jersey92 (talk) 20:17, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Lack of sufficient coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. Fails to meet the requirements of any of our notability guidelines. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 02:37, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. No RS, soapy. - - MrBill3 (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.