Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan Stursa

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus. Article defaults to "keep." Joyous 16:32, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Jan Stursa
The article reads "Jan Stursa (1880 - 1925) was a Czechoslovakian sculptor." End of article. With 862 google hits is this figure "notable enough"? Where does the bar of notability lie for foreign sculptors and artists? GRider\talk 20:16, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep. He's got an entry in the Grove Art database, so if he's notable enough for them, he's notable enough for us. Gamaliel 20:19, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, article does not establish notability. Megan1967 06:04, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The article isn't much, but he is clearly a significant artist. The website of the City Gallery of Prague mentions him as one of "the founding personalities of Czech sculpture". The Czech National Gallery, in a very brief text on 19th century art, speaks of "the turn-of-the-century generation led by Jan Štursa". And what does his "foreignness" have to do with anything? Would or should the bar of notability be lower if he was born in Liverpool? / u p p l a n d 07:58, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The Columbia Encyclopedia has an article on this guy although it is a stub at best. I hope we could do better. Capitalistroadster 10:06, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing much in this stubby article. JamesBurns 05:54, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.