Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jan at Blue Fox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ronald Duncan.  Sandstein  13:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Jan at Blue Fox

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unable to find any reliable secondary sources covering this short-lived piece of lost media. Fails WP:GNG. pinktoebeans (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  pinktoebeans  (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  pinktoebeans  (talk) 13:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep It was a very old television show, so it is difficult for anyone to find sources on the internet. However in the article there are some references. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 14:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I agree that it is difficult to find sources online for it, but all the sources in the article are passing mentions or indexes showing the show/columns existed - not enough to make up "significant coverage". Older media can be influenctial and notable, but as far as I can tell this piece does not suffice. pinktoebeans  (talk) 14:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I also agree with merge to Ronald Duncan. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 00:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Ronald Duncan, the author on whose columns this show was based. Much of this article is already focused on the source material by Duncan anyway. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge per Metropolitan90. A lack of notability for a stand alone article could be in part because. 1)- "in total it lasted for four episodes", 2)- "little else is known about this early show.", and 3)- Seven of the nine references are from two sources. That something exists does not mean it is notable for publishing. --  Otr500 (talk) 01:39, 17 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.