Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Morgan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Despite many "merge" opinions, no one has countered the deletion arguments here. I will spare only Jana Morgan (which I will redirect to The Fabulous Five) as it is the only one of the articles to have any real content. Mango juice talk 19:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Jana Morgan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * I originally listed this one under SD because it was identical to the "other" Katie Shannon listing. Agree with the reason for overall deletion, though I'd consider this one SD because of the dupe. Bagheera (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I originally listed this one under SD because it was identical to the "other" Katie Shannon listing. Agree with the reason for overall deletion, though I'd consider this one SD because of the dupe. Bagheera (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I originally listed this one under SD because it was identical to the "other" Katie Shannon listing. Agree with the reason for overall deletion, though I'd consider this one SD because of the dupe. Bagheera (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I originally listed this one under SD because it was identical to the "other" Katie Shannon listing. Agree with the reason for overall deletion, though I'd consider this one SD because of the dupe. Bagheera (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I originally listed this one under SD because it was identical to the "other" Katie Shannon listing. Agree with the reason for overall deletion, though I'd consider this one SD because of the dupe. Bagheera (talk) 21:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

These pages are all about characters, major and minor, from a children's book series, and have no notability asserted with them. CastAStone//(talk) 20:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of characters in the Fabulous Five books (or some such). Once there is enough encyclopedic material about any particular character, it can be broken back out into a dedicated article. Hqb (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge There isn't very much on any of these characters. Brianyoumans (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per above example. I don't really know anything about this series, so I couldn't provide a valid reason to warrant deletion (other than the obvious no notability asserted and extremely short so likely no notablity available). Regardless, I think they should all be merged into one article, then someone has the opportunity to expand upon the characters and provide references (including notability), if available. I think deletion might be warranted if a few months down the line the state of them once merged isn't improved upon. Bungle (talk • contribs) 21:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge per the guidelines of WP:FICT. None of these characters seems to have achieved independent notability, not even the Fab Five individually, that I can find. Which merge target, though, I'm undecided. Because many appear in both The Fabulous Five and Taffy Sinclair books, neither is appropriate; similarly, List of Fabulous Five characters suggested above is misleading. List of Taffy Sinclair and Fabulous Five characters is achingly ungainly, but is the best I can come up with. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   —Quasirandom (talk) 22:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all. They are all completely non-notable. I understand that merging is the preferred course of action in a case like this, but I don't think even the entire group taken a whole passes notability guidelines. Doctorfluffy (talk) 18:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge they look tiny. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all. I tend to agree with Doctorfluffy - these characters aren't notable enough to have their own entries outside of the main article.  --Dawn bard (talk) 15:35, 11 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.