Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana and Gavin Grazer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Jana and Gavin Grazer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP, not one independent reliable source in our page, Google searches for news and books get no verifiable hits at all. If they are not notable as a couple, why does our page treat them as one? Individually, she comes up blank in news and book searches, while he gets some hits, many of which mention him as the brother of a more notable producer. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:36, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose: working on doing exactly that, with regarding improving the page. MacCready (talk) 15:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Well the page was about her until recently when someone combined them... and it's currently a mess as the filmography is combined. Not sure why the page was messed up like this. Spanneraol (talk) 16:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My bad, I'm working on fixing that right back up. Are you in favour of keeping the page to improve upon also? MacCready (talk) 09:45, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * So far, despite the claim above of working on improving the references, the only action has been to use linkedin as a reference. -- Whpq (talk) 18:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:51, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:51, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - This page was moved by User:MacCready from being about Jana Grazer to be about the couple without any discussion. There are no reliable sources that indicate that the couple together are notable in any way.  Nor are they individually notable either.  As such, reverting the move would be pointless as the article would still be a problem from a notability standpoint. -- Whpq (talk) 19:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete It is high time that only being sourced to IMDb becomes grounds for speedy deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Neither Jana Thompson (the name she has performed under) nor Gavin Grazer appear to be notable, individually or as a couple. (I completely disagree "that only being sourced to IMDb should become grounds for speedy deletion". Many articles about people who have appeared in films or tv shows are sourced only to IMDB, but there may be many reliable sources available - and their career may include stage performances which are not included in IMDB. The policy WP:NPOSSIBLE "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article" has a very valid foundation, and speedy deletion does not allow reasonable time for improving sources.) RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:13, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.