Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Byrne Interchange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Spaghettify interchange. (non-admin closure) &#128156; melecie   talk  - 01:07, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Jane Byrne Interchange


This 9-year "megaproject" claims to solve traffic but I didn't see much improvement. Urbanists on Twitter roasted IDOT for this. -- AlphaBeta135 talk 00:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * DELETE WITH FIRE - this is why I moved away from Chicago. schetm (talk) 01:17, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * IDOT should be focusing on changing the horrendous cloverleaf interchange at I-90, I-290 and IL 53 to a better interchange. 73.168.5.183 (talk) 02:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep and expand for the same reason as Stroad &#128156; melecie   talk  - 05:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Speedy traffic calm and add public transport per INDUCED DEMAND YOU SILLY LAWMAKERS. –  City Urbanism  🗩   🖉  08:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The Blue Line, only public transit on the Jane Byrne Interchange. AlphaBeta135  talk 12:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Nuke it. SWinxy (talk) 21:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Turn into a kart racing game track. Come on, wouldn't you want to drive on it? So many shortcuts! -insert valid name here- (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.