Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Carr (actress)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Courcelles 23:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Jane Carr (actress)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This person does not appear to be notable, there is little claim to notability in the article, it is also completely unsourced. (If we do decide to keep it we need to find a better title, since we already have the biography of Jane Carr, another actress who is clearly notable. PatGallacher (talk) 09:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep and wikify - she's got 39 credits at IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0139731/ . I don't follow the actors' pages but I'm guessing that's enough. p.s. Agree on rename, since they're both English actresses I suggest Jane Carr (1909-1957). Adpete (talk) 10:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep but retitle (Jane Carr (Bunstrom))? VASterling (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - no independent reliable sources offer significant coverage so she fails WP:GNG. Per WP:ENT, she does not appear to have a cult following, does not appear to have made unique or innovative contributions to her craft and while she has a number of roles in films they for the most part appear to be roles far down the cast list and not leads or second-tier supporting parts. Are You The Cow Of Pain? (talk) 16:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Indented and struck !vote of indef-blocked sockpuppet of indef-blocked abusive puppetmaster User:Otto4711.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Significant roles: yes. Notable films: no. It takes some doing to compile that many credits in films (particularly of that era) I've never heard of, nor (judging from the paucity of IMDb votes), has anybody else. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:14, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry to disagree, but it seems that quite a few of her pre-WW2 films are indeed notable... and some even have Wikipedia articles. Further, a search for this actress name in google archives from 1932-1957 reveal her meting WP:GNG and WP:ENT... no matter that IMDB has a paucity of votes for her pre-WW2 films.  and I have not even begun digging through the variations of her real-life name(s).  Might you wish to reconsider, as the article is now getting attention?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment Three marriages and variations on her real name add up to a far wider set of search parameters.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:45, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment - None of these (except for Jane Carr) have any hits on IMDB. Adpete (talk) 06:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong KEEP and continue improvements per coverage in multiple articles and books from 1932 through 1957 showing notability meeting WP:GNG. Just takes a lot of digging, and yes... I have not yet begun digging through the varients of her real-life name.  I ask that the nominator now reconsider.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Plenty of film credits. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.