Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Darling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence that this subject passes our notability standards. Drmies (talk) 16:37, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Jane Darling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, just nominations. No independent reliable sourcing, beyond a brief mention on a list of performers arrested for working at a trade show while on a tourist visa. No reliably sourced biographical content. PROD bulk-removed (apparently via rollback) with a null edit summary. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete fails the GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - Subject appears to be notable, at least within the Czech Republic, as shown by her past award wins at the Czech Adult Film Awards and the coverage here. The coverage here doesn't hurt a claim towards at least a marginal pass of the GNG as well. Guy1890 (talk) 21:16, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Given that the "Czech Adult Film Awards" apparently don't exist (a whopping 4, count them, four, Google hits) -- and it's not likely a mere translation problem, as no similar awards, under any names, are mentioned in the subject's Euro-language wikiarticles, even the Czech article -- it's hard to see them as "well-known" and "significant", and it's also hard to see the article reporting on them as meeting RS requirements, especially for a BLP. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 00:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I specifically haven't argued above that the "Czech Adult Film Awards" meet the PORNBIO standard at all, because I quite frankly don't think that they currently do. The awards obviously do exist BTW. Guy1890 (talk) 01:05, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Where is the reliable evidence that they exist? They're not listed at the Czech wikipedia, or for that matter the German , Spanish , French , Frisian , Dutch , Romanian , and Turkish . This looks like claptrap a publicist made up and fed to a gullible reporter. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * We're all familiar with the reality that not everything that exists in real life has an article on Wikipedia...that's not a controversial concept at all. Heck, this entire discussion here is about potentially deleting a subject, that is - in fact - real, from existence on the English Wikipedia due to notablity concerns, which happens routinely on Wikipedia. The fact remains that similiar (if not exactly the same) awards are already mentioned on this Wikipedia and online here & here among other places. Are the awards in question here themselves yet notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia? Apparently not, but that does not mean that they are unimportant in the Czech Republic. Guy1890 (talk) 04:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. This individual clearly fails WP:PORNBIO. There appears to have been some awards awarded in the Czech Republic, however, they are not significant or well known. Therefore,  they confer no notability on their recipients. Finnegas (talk) 15:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

keep article seems to be written in neutral tone of language and have quality reference. Person concerned in the biography have achieved number of awards which makes the article notable Science.Warrior (talk) 12:20, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO as Finnegas states. Lacks well-known, significant award win. Even if you count the prague.tv article citation as reliable, Darling still comes up short on GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.