Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Egerton-Idehen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion.  MBisanz  talk 02:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Jane Egerton-Idehen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A couple of interviews and a listicle are all that this article is based on. The article fails SIGCOV, and should be deleted. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 16:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC) struck confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable businesswoman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — basically what, a non notable business woman. Harvard or not! Celestina007 (talk) 22:31, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The nominator was blocked as a sockpuppet, however I am leaving the nomination open because it has some merit. MER-C 17:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.