Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Lewson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure)  01:12, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Jane Lewson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a non-notable woman. Someone who may have served as a model for a single character and may have been over 110 years old is not notable enough. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  00:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  00:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have expanded the article, but unsure on notability yet. She was covered in a significant number of sources at the time, and I found at least 4 reprintings of her obituary in major publications of her, in addition to coverage in many other books.  JT dale Talk ~ 04:15, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wifione  Message 05:56, 3 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep: The Thomas Seccombe article in the 1893 Dictionary of National Biography and the Walter Scott journal entry are probably sufficient for notability, to which can be added the more hypothetical Dickens link. AllyD (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 17:19, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.