Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Randall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  09:26, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Jane Randall

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This person has left the modelling industry around 2011-2012 that she has decided to give up her modelling career and pursued with degree of law. This now fails within WP:NBIO. ApprenticeFan  work  10:25, 13 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Er, surely it always did. If she's left modelling, change "is" to "was" in the first sentence and that's it done. If she's notable or not is a separate issue, but this nomination seems to be based only on her having left. Emeraude (talk) 16:52, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:50, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Non-notable person. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:10, 21 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete not even close to being a notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep I added additional citations to the article which show significant discussion and interest about this subject over time. Easily passes WP:GNG for significant discussion in secondary sources. Lonehexagon (talk) 17:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC) WP:MILL model. Delete.2001:A61:4E6:C500:5DD1:DCD9:3049:64D7 (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
 * What issue do you have with the multiple reliable, independent sources that cover the subject in detail over the course of years? Additionally, I read WP:MILL, which is an unofficial essay as opposed to an official guideline, but even so I couldn't find any examples that apply to this subject. The examples of run-of-the-mill topics include residential addresses, commercial buildings, local sports, local clubs, local festivals, side streets, a bank, regular political rallies, and local lawyers. Which of these applies to this subject? Lonehexagon (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete I think this falls under WP:BLP1E, the event being her participation on America's Next Top Model; coverage of her modeling career such as is trivial.  Weak because  does seem somewhat substantial and is about something other than the show.  I'm unsure how reliable "observer.com" is, though, it's a purely digital media company with a "irreverent sensibility". power~enwiki ( π ,  ν ) 21:31, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * She has received significant coverage for her role as a New Jersey politics commentator. Even if you don't include the New York Observer coverage, there are other examples of coverage on that position, including New Jersey 101.5 and Politico. Lonehexagon (talk) 02:35, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the additional links. It's still a borderline case, but my !vote is now Weak Keep. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 02:46, 2 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.