Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Robbins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 17:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Jane Robbins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable local politician. Fails WP:NPOL. ...William 11:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions....William 00:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions....William 00:38, 17 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. She's a perfectly nice person, but as the mayor of a small city, not particularly notable. Jonathunder (talk) 03:37, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

 ''Politicians and judges who have held international, national or sub-national (statewide/provincewide) office, and members or former members of a national, state or provincial legislature. This also applies to persons who have been elected to such offices but have not yet assumed them.''
 * Delete Appears to fail our general notability guidelines at this time, sadly. SarahStierch (talk) 02:15, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - The politispam tone of the piece notwithstanding, the entire question here is whether elected mayorship of a small town of 3100 people is sufficient for an automatic pass under the Special Notability Guideline for politicians:

Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage.

Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability, although such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject of the article."


 * I don't see significant coverage rising to this level. Carrite (talk) 18:26, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.