Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janela Lelis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Janela Lelis

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

As per NOTNEWS, no sustained coverage on the subject who is notable for a single act of saving a Philippine flag during a typhoon who was likely just highlighted by some national media outlets to give some silver lining during a time of tragedy. Fails WP:GNG. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 11:59, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 12:15, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge Nothing in the way of sustained coverage beyond the one incident and event that's small. Could be a subsection in the history of the flag of the Philippines or something similar. Oaktree b (talk) 16:24, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, nothing interesting or special. Fails WP:BIO. — hueman1 ( talk •  contributions ) 18:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete due to notability issues. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 13:25, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this article illustrates all the problems with creating articles on non-notable minors who do one thing that gets a little attention. Lelis is not a "young Filipino girl" as the article states. She is either 22 or 23, a "young girl" prbably should be under 12, but clearly we should not be using the term for a woman age 21 or more, even if maybe we could justify it in a few cases up to age 18.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.