Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Emerson Bashen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. j⚛e deckertalk 06:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Janet Emerson Bashen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Press release for non notable figure with minor awards.  DGG ( talk ) 03:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - she seems like a great person, but without any reliable sources, she fails WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * P.S. I did look online - there are Zero news & newspaper Ghits, and only fleeting mentions in books and directories at Google books. Bearian (talk) 18:23, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, although I agree the previous incarnation of the article had much promotional junk, substandard references, unsourced allegations, so the AfD was thoroughly justified -- the problems have (hopefully) been fixed as per WP:HEYMANN. Clearly notable Houston businesswoman who is a software inventor, business leader, with searchable patent here, and here; her firm grew impressively according to Inc magazine, she appeared before Congress (which identified her as a knowledgeable business consultant on civil rights issues), she was cited by Ebony magazine as an influential notable exec, plus won this award. Other sources too. Notable businessperson, but the problem with past articles was way too much cruft which obscured the meat (if it stays I will try to keep it from growing out of control.)--Tomwsulcer (talk) 19:35, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:14, 28 August 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.