Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Fox


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst ✈(conjugate) 06:25, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Janet Fox

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't verify that she meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 12:08, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  12:22, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as mentioned, nothing suggests better independent notability and I would not suggest moving to Edna Faber as I'm not seeing solid weight there. SwisterTwister   talk  05:46, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep She was pre-internet, so searching on Newspaper Archive, I found a number of references which I added to the article. It looks like there's more, but I don't have time at the moment to add them. Passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Has many Broadway credits including lead in Stage Door,also many radio credits such as Manhattan at Midnight lead, so I think the actress passes WP:NACTOR see here Atlantic306 (talk) 01:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment as nominator I'm impressed with what's beenfound and now think she does meet WP:GNG., what do you think of the improvements? Boleyn (talk) 06:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Eh, it's something but I'm not entirely certain yet. SwisterTwister   talk  06:50, 5 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.