Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Jackson trivia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Physchim62 (talk) 13:43, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Janet Jackson trivia
Wikipedia is not a collection of trivia. Merge all useful contents to Janet Jackson, if any; otherwise, delete. - Mike Rosoft 16:33, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge with Janet Jackson. Capitalistroadster 17:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this comprehensively uninteresting trivia. Oh, merge it if you must. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 17:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't be bothered to read the entire boring Janet Jackson article to see what's there already, but if anything's not mentioned, well, no big loss, really. -R. fiend 17:41, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Merge content is ok, but do not leave redirect: merge means that a redirect is leaved in place of the merged article; Uncle G, am I correct? Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 17:55, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 19:02, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and Delete per nomination. - 160.5.237.99 19:17, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Whoops - 160.5.237.99 is me. Curse of the random log-out. mholland 19:23, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge only useful content JFW | T@lk  01:38, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge all useful content --JAranda &#124; watz sup 01:24, 10 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.