Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Jacme


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If somebody wants to recreate it as a redirect to List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame, feel free. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 15:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Janet Jacme

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBIO. The sources are not reliable enough for notability, and searching on Google does not give even a single result at all. Steve Quinn tried to draftify this, but the draftification was reverted by Malik Shabazz. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 06:25, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 06:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 06:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


 * keep My search found some coverage to boost the argument that WP:GNG is met plus being in the AVN hall of fame meets WP:PORNBIO.Sandals1 (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please provide sources that show GNG is met and the AVN hall of fame is not an independent reliable source as its function is to promote the porn industry and its actors. Notablity is not inherited. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep "The sources are not reliable enough for notability"? AVN and XBIZ are the trade journals of the business in which Jacme was employed. She's a member of the AVN Hall of Fame, which (as Sandals1 wrote) means she satisfies WP:PORNBIO. And Lil' Kim cited Jacme in her song "Big Momma Thang" (ranked #13 among the "50 Best Rap Songs by Women"). — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:44, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete the coverage is no where near enough to meet the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete no independent reliable sources cover this subject. Fails WP:NRV and WP:NBIO. All sources are industry related AVN magazine and XBIZ - this is not independent coverage. AVN awards are not independent coverage. Also, WP:BLP requires the subject's Wikipedia bio meet GNG standards and be verified as notable. With only non-independent coverage, as mentioned, this bio fails WP:BLP (which is policy) and WP:SOURCE (which is policy) because notability must be verifiable with reliable sources. If PORNBIO conflicts with BLP then BLP is the standard that must be adhered to. We strive for high quality articles sourced by high quality sources. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 07:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame. This BLP simply lacks any non-trivial reliable sourcing; the references are generally press releases, presskit pieces, and kayfabe. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 13:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable porn actress, Hasn't won any notable/significant awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG, Also dont see any point redirecting. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to List of members of the AVN Hall of Fame where the subject is mentioned. Article contains no relevant encyclopedic prose and significant RS coverage not found; see WP:NOPAGE. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:32, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.