Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Kreizman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes  04:04, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Janet Kreizman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has one single primary source and Google doesn't turn up any RS discussing her (a few mentions in passing). I believe this is completely non notable. WP:ORPHAN, and the fact it's a stub are just the icing. Hydromania (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * comment seems the article was tagged for deletion 5 yrs ago and then withdrawn a minute later diff I can't find it in the AfD archives so I don't know if it was actually submitted Hydromania (talk) 09:21, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 11:12, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:59, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete GNG requires multiple indepdent sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete'- No sources, does not pass WP:BIO--Rusf10 (talk) 03:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.